Postmodern Oil War II: Empire Strikes Back Sequel
FACTS versus PROPAGANDA
David Boje, Ph.D. October 16, 2002 New Mexico State University
(Revised Feb22 2003)
"All We are Saying --- Is Give Peace A Chance" (John
Lennon's hit song on top 100 list for 1969).
In preparation for the Teach-In Speak-Out for Peace in Iraq event scheduled
for October 28th (9AM to 10PM) at New Mexico State University (Corbett
Center), I put together some data that noted scholars and activists are using
to deconstruct propaganda being disseminated by the War Machine. Propaganda
is defined here as the rigging of intelligence analysts and media reporters so
as to stack the information deck given to the masses to be supportive of a
leader's/country's agenda (Boje, 2003, Deconstructing
Sun News editorial).
President Bush Jr. recently stated his reasons for invading Iraq: (1) Iraq
used chemical and biological weapons, (2) Iraq tried to build nuclear weapons,
(3) the US tried to bring Iraq into the "family of nations" (said
first by Bush Sr.), and (4) Iraq has a long history of lying to the world. The
problem is the data not live up to the president's rhetoric claims.
Propaganda exploits our fears and constructs a leader that gives us hope for
safe passage (Boje, 2003 Oil
War: Propaganda
and Root Cause). Corporate media is a major factor in the distribution of Heroic
War and Demonizing the Enemy propaganda because it resorts to hype and fear,
under reports the Peace Movement. Compliant corporate media owns the Western press and does not allow reports
about the swelling peace movement in the U.S. Rather, the role of the Western
corporate-owned media is to make the American-Iraq war appear 'just' and
'essential' to America's homeland 'security.'
We in the university are complicit when we do not engage in critical thinking
about the War Machine. The draft is coming back. Campus police and university
administration is being asked to spy on students, turn over information to the
Homeland Security and FBI (Boje, 2002, What
Students and Faculty Need to Know about the Iraq War).
Forms of U.S. resistance (i.e.
carnival of street theatre, the waving of peace signs at motorists in downtown
Las Cruces from 4 to 6 PM each Wednesday) to the war do not get media coverage.

This is done by blocking out coverage of the peace movement and the true human costs of this
latest war (See local press coverage). 500,000
in Washington DC gets reported as "thousands" in the the Sun News, in
all mainstream news. The U.S. media is part of the war machine and is unwilling engage in
facts-based analysis of presidential rhetoric or to depict the human carnage of
war. The carnage is not nearly as pretty as heroic war rhetoric.

Figure 1: Modern War image. (Photo shows victim of depleted
uranium tipped munitions, dubbed “Crispy Critters” by Dessert Storm
soldiers; Source Desert Storm Think Tank).
A Crispy Critter struck by depleted uranium munitions
of US military arsenal is not heroic. It is is economic; it cost the US $4
Trillion dollars since 1945 to pay corporations to build weapons of mass
destruction. There is also benefit: the USA is the biggest arms seller in a one
trillion dollar arms market. The intelligence community is being pressured to provide false data to
support the administration's war machine (Boje, 2003 Deconstructing
Bu$h). I witnessed this before in the
manufacture of body counts and the faking of incidents (e.g. Tonkin Bay), in
order to sustain public support for the war machine during Vietnam. The
current need is to turn the propaganda machine into a way to sell the current
postmodern war. Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq are postmodern wars, media-driven,
theatrical, spectacles of corporate and state propaganda to enlist spectator
support for war. Postmodern war is defined, by philosophers Best and Kellner
(2001), as the implosion of human and machine in cyber and bio technology (Boje,
2002a).
The Gulf spectacle was “postmodern” in that,
first, it was a media event that was experienced as a live occurrence for the
whole global village. Second, it managed to blur the distinction between truth
and reality in a triumph of the orchestrated image and spectacle. Third, the
conflict exhibited a heightened merging of individuals and technology,
previewing a new type of cyberwar that featured information technology and
“smart” weapons (Best & Kellner, 2001: 73).

Figure 2: Postmodern War image. Source: http://www.cursor.org
and http://www.mnftiu.cc
A postmodern war uses hyperreality and interactive simulation cyber
technologies to sanitize war into bloodless images I analyzed 9-11
(Afghanistan) as a postmodern war (Boje, 2002a). The theatrics of 9-11,
a postmodern war, makes military confrontation and collateral damage (cruel
civilian casualties in Figure 1), mere digital abstractions (such as Figure 2)
Technological innovations in warfare from biotechnology,
cyber war, and infotainment have fused with state, military, and corporate
capitalism to transform the theatrics of capitalism into a social corporeality
more postmodern than Vietnam or WW1 and WWII (Boje, 2002a).
In postmodern war, the line between military combat and entertainment gets
blurred in endless graphic-enhanced replay and simulation: The differences
between the modern and postmodern theatrics of warfare include current uses of
robot drones, satellites, digital battlefields, and other high tech technologies
that change both the theatre of operations, the game of war, and its theatric
strategy.
During the Gulf War the commentary of
military and football analysts -- and the methods deployed to illustrate and
explain sports and the war -- became almost indistinguishable. During ABC's
broadcast of Super Bowl XXV, an important part of the rhetorical [I’d say
theatrical] strategy was to turn the event into much more than a game in order
to justify playing the contest. Indeed, the Super Bowl and its viewers became
important--even essential--participants in the war effort.[i]
[additions in brackets, mine].
The logic of this latest postmodern war, is that Iraq civilian lives
must be sacrificed in preemptive invasion in order to protect future American lives.
In pre-game (pre-war) analysis, President Bush tells the media corps that the
Iraqi regime is in league with al-Qaida. The international media and more
critical scholars argue that Bush's claims are misleading the American public,
and that war is not justified. The postmodern war theatrics call for building up
Saddam as the Super Bowl-type enemy that will be defeated by the red, white and
blue team. In an election year, critical analysis and opposition to the war
among politicians (even democrats) is few and far between. In postmodern war it
becomes difficult to separate fact from propaganda. Nevertheless, the facts are
quite sobering.
Fact: Bush administration has offered no concrete proof of any of the Iraqi
al-Qaida connection. Even the recent CIA letter says there is no evidence that
Saddam intends to commit terrorism against the United States (Click here
for CIA report).
Fact: The Bush administration (i.e., Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld;
Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz) is pressuring the corporate-owned media
and its CIA analysts to tailor their assessments of the Iraqi threat to help
build the president's case against Saddam Hussein (Click here
for Times article on the pressure).
Below I put some facts to the propaganda of this postmodern war (I also
include some dialog I have had with peopel who pose counter-facts):
Here are facts and counter-facts about "Iraq used chemical weapons"
- Question: Is there one piece of credible evidence that Iraq has stockpiles
of weapons of chemical weapons that it intends to use against the U.S.?
- A former US soldier tells me, "Several
of my friends were exposed to burning bunkers that were destroyed by
coalition armor. It was reported that some of these bunkers may have
contained mustard gas."
- Allegation: President Bush said about Saddam, "He's used poison gas
on his own people." FACT: US officials, including his Bush Sr.
had no qualms about helping Saddam gas Iranians;
- Fact: Donald Rumsfeld traveled to Baghdad in 1985 and met with Saddam
Hussein as a private businessman on behalf of the Reagan administration. In
the last major battle of the Iran-Iraq war, some 65,000 Iranians were
killed, many by gas.
- One person tell me, "In 8 years
almost 1 million Iranians died. There was no tally after the last
battles. I have yet to find a record of the last battles
casualties."
- Fact: Iraq did possess and use chemical weapons in the 1980s, but it is
the U.S. that helped arm Iraq with military equipment, including chemical
weapons, to use against Iran between 1985-1988; "U.S. government
manufactures chemical and biological weapons, a fact that was routinely
denied and only admitted after the anthrax attacks of 2001" (International
Answer).
- A former US soldier tells me, "Fact is
that while the US was providing aid to Iraq in the form of older
obsolete weapon system Iraq was using the available funds to buy 30,000$
T72M2s from Russia. Including some T62s and T55 tanks which by this time
were also very obsolete."
- Fact: U.S. continued to sell chemical weapons to Iraq until Kuwait
invasion in 1989; "These included anthrax, components of mustard gas,
botulinum toxins (which causes paralysis of the muscles involving swallowing
and is often fatal), histoplasma capsulatum (which may cause pneumonia,
enlargement of the liver and spleen, anemia, acute inflammatory skin disease
marked by tender red nodules), and a host of other nasty chemicals
materials" (Boles,
2002; also S.R.103-900, May 25, 1994, pg. 264);
- Fact: "During the 1991 Gulf War, Iraq did not use chemical or
non-conventional weapons, but the U.S. did. It dropped tons of depleted
uranium weapons all over Iraq" (International
Answer).
- A former US soldier tells me, "Fact the Iraqi armored forces did
in fact use DU ammo supplied by the Soviet Union."
- Fact: "U.S. government used chemical weapons in Vietnam, spraying
Agent Orange over vast parts of that country. Thousands of U.S. GIs and an
unknown number of Vietnamese people died, or live difficult and painful
lives from the after-effects" (International
Answer).
- Fact: Mr. Tenet's CIA letter says Iraq Chemical weapons is NOT a
threat - "CIA stating that while Saddam Hussein poses little threat to
America now, a US invasion could push him into retaliating with chemical or
biological weapons" (Borger, 2002b; more
on Tenet letter).
- Counterpoint - A former US soldier tells me, "Fact
is that if Saddam has no Weapons of Mass Destruction then if we make the
mistake and attack him and he retaliates then we were right all the
time."
- Question: "Are you familiar with the 1994 Senate Hearings that
revealed the U.S. knowingly supplied chemical and biological materials to
Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war and as late as 1992- including after the
alleged Iraqi gas attack on a Kurdish village?" and "if there were
any weapons from 1990-1998 found by UNSCOM Inspectors, they were provided by
the US." (Congressman
Ron Paul).
- Counterpoint, from former US soldier, "It
is believed that the Clinton administration sent the agents to Iraq to
help start a war with the US so Clinton could look good............Fact
is the sale of agents to Iraq never happened after the war ended."
- Fact: "George Bush [Sr.], operating largely behind the scenes
throughout the 1980s, initiated and supported much of the financing,
intelligence, and military help that built Saddam's Iraq into the aggressive
power that the United States ultimately had to destroy." - Koppel,
June, 1990 - as cited in Boles,
2002.
- Fact: Iraq has only a shadow of the power it had in 1990; Iraq's military
is 1/5th the size it was in 1990, which at that time proved unable to defend
anything.
- Counterpoint, from former US soldier, "The
Iraqi Army is in fact a shadow of itself. BUT if it does have WMD then
its military is larger than it was during the Gulf War."
Here are the facts about Iraq tried to build nuclear
weapons; Bush said, "Before being barred from Iraq in 1998, the
(U.N.) International Atomic Energy Agency dismantled extensive nuclear
weapons-related facilities, including three uranium enrichment sites."
- Question: Is there one piece of credible evidence that Iraq has stockpiles
of nuclear weapons that it intends to use against the U.S.?
- Fact: International Institute for Strategic Studies, based in London,
concluded in a report issued last month that "Iraq does not possess
facilities to produce fissile material in sufficient amounts for nuclear
weapons" and that "it would require several years and extensive
foreign assistance to build such fissile material production
facilities."
- Fact: "U.S. has the largest nuclear arsenal--more than 6,000 nuclear
missiles and bombs. It has spent $4 trillion on nuclear weapons since
1945" (International
Answer).
- Fact: UNSCOM Chief Inspector, Scott Ritter, says that Iraq is essentially
disarmed of all weapons of mass destruction.
- Fact: Bush statements about Iraq nuclear weapons are directly counter to
assessments made by U.S. intelligence agencies.
- e.g. CIA Director George Tenet said the CIA had concluded that
"Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting
terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW (chemical or biological
weapons) against the United States.
- e.g. Report by the CIA said that unless Iraq is able to obtain
enriched uranium abroad, it will take at least five years to be able to
develop the uranium necessary for a nuclear warhead (Collier, 2002).
- Question: How many chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass
destruction are stored in New Mexico?
Here are the facts about how US tried to bring Iraq into
the "family of nations" (said first by Bush Sr.).
- Question: Is there one piece of credible evidence that the U.S. is trying
in any way to bring Iraq into the family of nations?
- Fact: "We've bombed Iraq thirty-odd times this year" (Tripp,
2002). Reason U.S. elects to bomb Iraq is they can not retaliate;
"'Stop the bombing' - More bombing and war in the case of Iraq will not
achieve anything but civilian deaths and misery. All parties should disavow
preparations for war and the threat of war" (Voice
4 Change).
- Fact: The continuation of US and UK bombing of Iraq since Dessert Storm in
1991 has not been sanctioned by the UN (Guardian).
- Fact: U.S. plays Iran off against Iraq, and vice versa; covert operators
of the U.S. armed Iran, at the same time other operative armed Iraq.
- Fact: Bush plans to install government in Iraq to exploit oil profit;
Faisal Qaragholi, the "petroleum engineer who directs the London office
of the Iraqi National Congress (INC), an umbrella organization of opposition
groups that is backed by the United States" says that "Our oil
policies should be decided by a government in Iraq elected by the
people." Ahmed Chalabi, the INC leader, put it more bluntly and sadi
that he favored a U.S.-led consortium to develop Iraq's oil fields, which
would replace the existing agreements that Iraq has with Russia and France.
"American companies will have a big shot at Iraqi oil," Chalabi
said (Boles, 2002);
Halliburton Co. had interests in Iraqi oil production after the [Gulf ]
war."
- Fact: this is an oil war: "Why do the oil company executives strongly
support this war if oil is not the real reason we plan to take over
Iraq?" and "Are we willing to bear the economic burden of a 100
billion dollar war against Iraq, with oil prices expected to skyrocket and
further rattle an already shaky American economy? How about an estimated 30
years occupation of Iraq that some have deemed necessary to "build
democracy" there?" (Congressman
Ron Paul).
- Fact: When Iraq Oil War happens, oil prices will go up, oil companies will
get rich, and middle-class Americans will pay the higher prices for
oil.
- Fact: "Oil, clearly, is the commercial jackpot in this war"
(Ridgeway, 2002). This is the black-gold rush for the oil-igarchy.
Facts about propaganda - by topic and by U.S. presidency
Weapons inspections [William J. Clinton president from 1993-2001 & George W. Bush
president from 2001-present]
- Question: Is there one piece of credible evidence that Iraq has stockpiles
of weapons of mass destruction that it intends to use against the U.S.?
- Fact: Between 1991 and December 12, 1998. There were over 9,000
inspections to assess Weapons of Mass Destruction. The fact is there
were very few incidents where there were any delays or challenges to
inspections.
- Fact: "For the last four years it has been the U.S. government that
has worked hard at manipulating the UN so that there would be no inspectors
in Iraq" (International
Answer).
- Fact: "United Nations Special Commission--UNSCOM--cited only five
"obstructions" to the 423 inspections conducted between Nov.
18-Dec.12, 1998 (a typical inspection period just before Dessert Fox war).
All five incidents were trivial and not a justification for all out war:
- One was a 45-minute delay before allowing access, while keys were
fetched.
- Another
was Iraq's rebuff to a demand by a U.S. inspector, Dianne Seamons, that she be able to
interview all the undergraduate students in Baghdad University's Science
Department.
- Inspect a building on a Friday, a Muslim
holy day.
- Inspect another building on a Friday, a Muslim holy day
- On December 9, an inspection of a small headquarters of the Baathist
political party was challenged;. Inspectors left after they were asked,
'what is the relation between the
small headquarters of a party and the disarmament mission?' (See International
Answer; CIN
Just Archives).
- Fact: Scott Ritter, a former UN inspector and Marine Intelligence Officer,
says that UNSCOM confirmed that Iraq had destroyed all biological, chemical,
missile, and nuclear weapons. (Chicago Tribune, "Cheney's warped
perspective," 9/10/02).
- Fact: "Less than 48 hours after the inspectors were withdrawn from
Iraq, the Pentagon began the massive bombing campaign known as Operation
Desert Fox on Dec. 16-19, 1998" (International
Answer).
- Fact: Who are the weapons inspectors? U.S. officials publicly admitted the
weapons inspectors were intelligence agents who provided Pentagon bombing
planners with bombing coordinates. (New York Times, Jan. 7, 1999)
- Question: How to rid the world of U.S. weapons of mass destruction. "Is
it not true that those who argue that even with inspections we cannot be
sure that Hussein might be hiding weapons, at the same time imply that we
can be more sure that weapons exist in the absence of inspections?" (Congressman
Ron Paul).
- Options: How about - UN inspectors -- not only in Iraq, but open up US
facilities to parallel inspections (Voice
4 Change).
Global Terrorism [George W. Bush president from 2001-present]
- Question: Is there one piece of credible evidence that Iraq has any
connection to al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, or 9-11 terrorist attacks?
- Question: "Is it not true that the intelligence community has been
unable to develop a case tying Iraq to global terrorism at all, much less
the attacks on the United States last year? Does anyone remember that 15 of
the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and that none came from Iraq?"
(Congressman
Ron Paul).
- Fact: "CIA and FBI investigators -- said that despite allegations of
links between Mohamed Atta, the main planner of the terrorist attacks, and
an Iraqi intelligence agent, there was no evidence of ties... One of the
Palestinians cited by Bush, Abu Nidal, was last active in the 1980s and died
in Baghdad in August. Another, Abu Abbas, conducted his last terrorist act
in 1990, now renounces violence, and lives in the Gaza Strip with apparent
Israeli permission" (Collier, 2002). More
on this point from UK intelligence sources.
- Fact: "Bob Baer, a former CIA agent who tracked al-Qaida's rise, said
that there were contacts between Osama bin Laden and the Iraqi government in
Sudan in the early 1990s and in 1998: 'But there is no evidence that a
strategic partnership came out of it. I'm unaware of any evidence of Saddam
pursuing terrorism against the United States'" (Borger, 2002a).
- Fact: Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay interviewed over a dozen
military, intelligence and diplomatic officials on link of Iraq and global
terrorism -- "These officials charge that administration hawks have
exaggerated evidence of the threat that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein poses --
including distorting his links to the al-Qaida terrorist network -- have
overstated the amount of international support for attacking Iraq and have
downplayed the potential repercussions of a new war in the Middle East. They
charge that the administration squelches dissenting views and that
intelligence analysts are under intense pressure to produce reports
supporting the White House's argument that Saddam poses such an immediate
threat to the United States that pre-emptive military action is necessary"
(Strobel & Landay, 2002).
- Fact: 15 of the 19 participants in the September 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks were citizens of Saudi Arabia.
- A fearful people is easier to rule.
Vietnam War - 1970s [Lyndon B. Johnson president 1963-69; Richard M. Nixon
president 1969-74; Gerald R. Ford president 1974-77]
- Fact: 50,000 American lives were lost in Vietnam in an undeclared
war.
- Fact: President Lyndon Johnson staged a fake raid on a Navy vessel in
Tonkin Gulf incident as legitimacy for U.S. to go to (undeclared) war in
Vietnam
- Fact: Hitler staged a phony invasion from Poland as legitimacy for Germans
to go to war (Lightwear, 2002).
Gulf War - 1991-1992 [George Bush, President from 1989-93]
- Question: "Is it not true that anywhere between 100,000 and 300,000 US soldiers
have suffered from Persian Gulf War syndrome from the first Gulf War, and
that thousands may have died?" (Congressman
Ron Paul).
- Fact: How many Iraq civilians died in 1991 Dessert Storm is hard to estimate.
Both sides are motivated to under-count. The U.S. estimate
is 13,000 Iraqi civilians were killed, while Iraq estimate is only 8,243.
Voice $ Change says- A quarter of a million people died in Operation Desert Storm in 1992 (Voice
4 Change). A recent study suggests a civilian casualty cover-up by both sides, where
as many as 300,000 civilians probably died in the conflict (Axelrod,
2002)
- Fact: Who supplied? Bush Sr. authorized U.S. corporations to sell of $4.8
million worth of advanced technology products between July 18 and August 1,
1991, right up to the Gulf War.
- Fact: "April Glaspie, U.S. ambassador to Iraq during the first Bush
administration, seems to have given Hussein a partial go-ahead to take some
border oil wells just before he went farther and seized all of Kuwait in
August 1990.
- Fact: Bush Senior's 1990-91 liberation of Kuwait from Iraqi occupation
depended upon building Hussein into an international ogre. Yet, Hussein was
and is a second rate despot, not a world threat" (Phillips, 2002).
"Central to [Bush Sr.'s] campaign [for 2nd term in office] was the
glorious Desert Storm victory (Axelrod, 2002).
- Fact: When Bush Sr. called off U.S. military when Sadam's days seemed
numbered. This outcome fed voters' sense of a Bush failure and caused him
the reelection. Bush Jr. in 2002 wants to finish Bush Sr.'s unfinished war,
as his legacy.
Iran-Iraq War - 1983-1988 [Ronald W. Reagan president from 1981-89]
- Fact: Over one million people died in the Iran-Iraq war of 1983-1988 (Voice
4 Change).
- Fact: U.S supported Iraq during its war with Iran in the 1980s despite
their use of chemical weapons (Phillips, 2002); 1984 the U.S. State
Department officially, but quietly, confirmed the use of chemical weapons by
Iraq.
- Fact: Iraq is not all Muslim; there are over three-quarters of a million
Christians in Iraq; church in Iraq pre-dates the arrival of Islam there by
some six hundred years.
- Fact: 1988 Saddam's military began gassing its own Kurdish population; US
corporations provided the key products used and US continued to drag its
feet in condemning chemical & biological warfare until the oil fields of
Kuwait were invaded, and US went into Gulf War in 1991.
- Fact: U.S. corporations, says a 1994 Senate subcommittee hearing, were the
key suppliers of the toxins and spores Iraq had used to build up its
chemical and biological arsenal it then used against Iran.
Operation Dessert Fox war - beginning Dec. 16 1998 [William J. Clinton
president from 1993-2001]
- Fact: There were no major weapons inspections by Iraq; between Nov 18 and
Dec 12, 1998 there were only 5 quite minor violations (e.g. a 45 minute
delay before keys were retrieved, two inspections demanded on Muslim holy
day, an unreasonable request by an inspector to interview every
undergraduate at Baghdad University's Science Department). In addition,
President Sadaam Hussein publicly accepted all the U.S. demands, making it
difficult for U.S. President Bill Clinton to justify Dessert Fox..
- Fact: Under pretext of failure to comply with weapons of mass destruction
inspections, the U.S. and UK dropped tons of missiles and bombs for
100 days; including 400 cruise missiles and 600 precision-guided bombs (15%
missed their targets). The biggest part of the raid took place between 17
and 21 December 1998.
- Fact: "The explosions began at 12:49 a.m. Thursday (4:49 p.m. EST
Wednesday)" (AP
Dec 16 1998).
- Fact: "Crude oil prices rose 7% Wednesday before the U.S. air strikes
against Iraq and then surged in after-hours trading" (Bloomberg
News, Dec 17 1998). The attack on Iraq worked off a global supply glut
estimated at 100 million to 150 million barrels (ibid).
- Fact: Before the raid, U.S. intelligence agents pretending to be United
Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) treaty inspectors did target where the
bombs and missiles would fall.
- Fact: The timing of Dessert Fox related to Congress/Senate deliberation
over Clinton's impeachment; The Impeachment Hearings and the Bombings began
on the same day [Bombs fell on evening of Dec 16th]. Therefore, you one can
assert that Operation Fox was a diversion strategy by a president under siege
by the opposition party. On Dec 17th Congress voted to delay the Impeachment
Hearings (AP, Dec
17, 1998). An AP poll said 182 lawmakers would support impeachment, 181
said they would oppose it (ibid, for more see US-Iraq
Coverage).
- Fact: Cost to US of Dessert Fox - $2.6 billion dollars for ordinance and
$20 million to deploy US troops.
- Fact: US and UK destroyed every electric utility, every sewage treatment
plant, and every water purification facility in Iraq. Few have been rebuilt.
- Fact: U.S. dropped 390 tons of radioactive nuclear weapons. This spread
radio active particles throughout Southern Iraq.
- Fact: US and UK have continued periodic bombings of Iraq between 1998 and
today. Those air strikes left 156 dead and wounded another 371; But this pales
in comparison to the 5,300 a month dying from the sanctions in next 12
years.
Iraq Sanctions war [William J. Clinton president from 1993-2001 & George W. Bush
president from 2001-present]
- Question: Is Oil for Food the answer?
- Fact: Over half a million Iraqi children died in the twelve years of the US-led
sanctions regime (Unicef statistic; Voice
4 Change; 10 Reasons to End the
Sanctions).
- Fact: 5,300 Iraqi children die every month from 12 years of sanctions and
continued bombing by US and UK (30 times in 2002) (source Guardian).
- Fact: Sanctions is a U.S. strategy to destabilize the Iraq economy. The
terms include a prohibition against Iraw feeding itself. For example Iraq
had 1.5 million bushels of wheat (a bumber crop) but could not use it to
feed anyone, under the OFF program terms. The result?:
- In 12 years of sanctions, children die at rate of 5,300 per month, half million
dead.
- Total dead from sanctions as of Feb 2003 is estimated at 1.7 million
civilians
- Iraq Dinar was devalued by 600,000 percent.
- UNICEF says 410,000 metric tons of food are delivered a month; this
means Iraq is a virtual refugee camp.
- Fact: Aug. 6, 1990, the U.N. Security Council adopted Resolution 661,
imposing economic sanctions on Iraq.
- Fact: United States has maintained its own sanctions against Iraq since
Aug. 2, 1990
- Fact: And, 1 million Iraqi civilians through the quieter, less dramatic weapon
known as economic sanctions (International
Answer).
- "Ramsey Clark offers the sobering reminder that U.S.-led sanctions
against Iraq "have now killed more than 750,000 human beings, perhaps
twice that many, the great majority, infants, children, older persons and
those who suffered serious chronic illnesses." [ii];
In 12 years the sanctions killed $1 million people through mal nutrition,
lack of medical supplies, infant mortality, polluted water, prohibitions
against Iraqi growing and eating their own food crops.
- Question: Is it true "none of the designated president's advisers who
advocate a regime change in Iraq have had any experience in the military
(even the designated president's military experience in the Texas Air
National Guard included one year AWOL) ?" (Keener,
2002).
- Point: The real goal of the Iraq sanctions and the new Iraq War is a
grab for the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world (10% of the world's total
reserves).
Afghanistan war [William J. Clinton president from 1993-2000; George W. Bush
president from 2001-present]
- Fact: In August 1998, President Clinton launched cruise missiles at
Al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan and at a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan to
distract attention from Monica Lewinsky (Phillips, 2002).
- Fact: In Afghanistan, U.S. military strategists used cluster bombs and
dropped landmines in populated regions to attack dubious military targets.
Estimates are that 3,000 to 3,400 civilians died in the U.S. air war upon
Afghanistan (Click here
for article by Dr. Herold, 2002).
Iraq War [George W. Bush president from 2001-present]
- Fact: Iraq is no threat to the U.S. Iraq has a GNP the size of Kentucky.
Iraq's army, after the Gulf war, is 1/5th the size that was no match to U.S.
military.
- Fact: This is a Bush family vendetta left over from the unfinished Persian
Gulf War. Bush Jr. is fighting daddy's war.
- Fact: Iraq war is a way to deflect USA public attention away from a sliding
economy in an election year.
- Fact: the USA military budget is six times any other nation, and is more
than the top military budgets of 27 nations (Boje, 2003 Militarism
and Middle School).
Gulf War Syndrome - USA use of Depleted
Uranium
The following facts come form a documentary "Invisible War: depleted
Uranium and the politics of radiation" and from presentations by Damacio
Lopez (Feb 2, 2003), a resident of Socorro, New Mexico and an expert in USA cover-up
of the death toll to USA service men and women, and to Iraqi civilians.
Mr. Lopez is trying to get medical study of deaths and diseases in Socorro he
suspects come from open air testing of Depleted Uranium weapons on top of Socorro
mountain. He is part of IDUST (International
Depleted Uranium Study Team). These weapons are also tested at White Sands
Military Reserve (WSMR). The Pentagon tells us that depleted uranium is so safe
we would have to swallow pounds of it to be affected, that it is no more toxic
than beach sand, that Gulf War vets are suffering from post-traumatic stress
disorder, not from any effects of USA weapons of depleted uranium.
- Fact: Depleted Uranium effects on Socorro citizens are not being studied.
"Since the 1950s weapons containing DU have been tested and developed
near communities across the U.S.. One such community is Socorro, New Mexico
where DU open air testing began in 1972 and ended in 1993 after pressure
from a local citizens group called "Save our Mountain" (International
Depleted Uranium Study Team).
- Fact: Depleted Uranium was used in 1991 Gulf War, 1998 Dessert Fox War, as
well as Bosnia, Serbia, and Kosovo. In Gulf War I, 230 tons of DU was used
in USA arms and another 800 tons of uranium waste for USA nuclear program
was dropped onto Iraq. The 'Highway of Death" in Iraq, is where
military vehicle carcasses, riddled with depleted uranium are on exhibit as
a permanent health hazard. The Highway
of Death has 2,000 vehicles and tens of thousands of charred and
dismembered bodies littered the sixty miles of highway. Children play with
the spent uranium rounds, civilians breath in the cancerous agents
(See Ramsey Clark report:
WAR
CRIMES
A Report on United States War Crimes Against Iraq to the Commission
of Inquiry for the International War Crimes Tribunal by Ramsey Clark and
Others
- Fact: U238 (a waste product of the Plutonium used in Nuclear Power plants)
has been found in the Depleted Uranium dust and in the vehicles
left on the Highway of Death.
- Fact: DU contamination lasts 4.5 billion years.
- Fact: Of the 696,778 troops who served during the recognized conflict
phase (1990-1991) of the Gulf War, 250,000 USA Gulf War vets have reported
to the VA to get treatment for Gulf War Syndrome (code for exposure to USA weapons
of Depleted Uranium). See NM Depleted Uranium Study
Team analysis for more recent statistics.
- Fact: 159,000 USA Gulf War vets are getting VA medical benefits, but
little serious treatment for exposure to Depleted UraniumSee NM
Depleted Uranium Study Team analysis for more recent statistics.
- Fact: As of Feb 2003, 9,600 USA Gulf War vets (1990-1991) have died from
Gulf War exposure to USA weapons that fired rounds tipped with Depleted
Uranium. They breathed in the dust, they ate the dust, they passed along the
effects to their unborn children. See NM
Depleted Uranium Study Team analysis for more recent statistics which
put it at 10,324 deaths.
- Fact: Instead of science, the Pentagon performs and contracts junk science
to cover-up the health hazards of depleted uranium weapons. For example,
Lieutenant Col. Eric Daxon and his aide, Bernard Rsstoker, were tasked by USA congress
to study the effects of DU in Gulf War upon USA service men and women.
Lieutenant Col
Dixon (2001 Video "Invisible War) said "the science says it is
very unlikely: that anyone would die from exposure to depleted uranium.
Medical doctor, Naomi Harvey of NYU Medical School, does contract work for
the Pentagon to prove that depleted uranium has no adverse health effects.
For example, Dr Harvey reports (1999), "depleted uranium is less
radioactive than the natural form and is about half as radioactive as the
original natural uranium" (United
Nations Panel discussion of Depleted Uranium - October 26, 1999). She
concludes, "There are a tremendous number of people that have been
followed for years to detect any health effects. There have been industrial
exposures that have been quite enormous, from accidents, etc. Nobody has
seen a significant health effect to date." Dr. Harvey cites a Rand
Study, which is a literature review (See
report summary). On the other side is Mr. Fahey, a national organizer on depleted
uranium munitions for the Military Toxics Project, a non-governmental
organization. Fahey says, "The RAND Report, I believe, in the future
will be largely discredited." Hari Sharma adds "The information
gathered so far through the analysis of urine samples convinces us that
uranium dioxide produced by the use of uranium weapons finds its way in
human lungs through inhalation. Presence of uranium dioxide in lungs in
veterans and in the civilian population does put the exposed population to
undue risk. It is therefore essential that the use of uranium weapons in
warfare must be banned" (United
Nations Panel discussion of Depleted Uranium - October 26, 1999).
- Fact: 800 tons of Depleted Uranium was dropped onto the population of Iraq,
and USA troops breathed the dust, and had it fall onto their skin, and ate
it when it fell on their food. Depleted Uranium is dropped in so-called
"Dirty Bombs" to spread uranium poison in the battle field.
Depleted Uranium is used in Cluster bombs. Depleted Uranium is used in USA
produced anti-personnel mines.
- Fact: A study, which examined British, Canadian and U.S. veterans, all
suffering typical Gulf War Syndrome ailments, found that, "nine years
after the war, 14 of 27 veterans studied had DU in their urine"
(Johnson, Nov 12 2002 Iraqi
cancers, birth defects blamed on U.S. depleted uranium).
Depleted Uranium Sites
Cluster Bombs
Why are cluster bombs being used? Cluster bombs
are not a surgical air strike; they are weapons of mass destruction. They are
loaded with Depleted Uranium, and spread toxic dust on USA troops and the
civilian population. Cluster
bombs are used to cover a broad area rather than a single specific target.
CBU-89 Gators, for example, are 1,000-pound cluster bombs dropped by B-52 and
B-1 bombers. Cluster bombs were used extensively in the 78-day bombardment of
Yugoslavia two years ago. Each bluster bomb unleashes 147 to 700 bomblets,
each firing a plasma-jet able to penetrate armor but having a secondary
anti-personnel effect with over 2,000 sharpened pieces cutting into the bomb
casing. According to the UN, 30,000 unexploded bomblets remained in Kosovo
after the conflict ended. 60 percent of the 531 cluster bombs dropped by the
RAF during the conflict in Kosovo missed their intended target (5% and 12% of
the bomblets fail to Explode, according to UN estimates). [iii]
Conclusions
The media and the administration's analysts are setting up the next
postmodern war, a war staged in the media through sanitized images and
football-game-style graphic replays. We are about to see more replays of laser
guided missiles with video cameras relaying the action to American TV sets
10,000 miles from the action. The Iraq postmodern war will be one more sanitized, quickie technowar, fought
(Nintendo-style) by remote-control, before a national election. As in the Bush
Sr. war, the Bush Jr. war will be accompanied by the same uncritical,
self-censored media coverage of the conflict which will once again facilitate
the slaughter of Iraqis by a superior military superpower. There will be self-censoring
of the more gory aspects of the victor’s slaughter, and we will hear claims of
acceptable collateral damage. As in the last postmodern war, CNN, Fox, CBS, NBC,
and ABC will compete for audience-share by offering better simulations and
digital interactive experiences to spectators. Postmodern war is an infotainment
commodity in the ratings game. Corporate-media can offer digital experience that
is less terrifying, so spectators need not look at 'real' bodies, or the blood
and gore of war.
The
purpose of postmodern war is cathartic, not realistic. Aristotle (350 BCE), for example, argues
that “fear and pity may be aroused by the Spectacle,” in the
spectator. The fear and pity are what happens to those who disagree with
war. The Bush rhetoric and the spectacle-dispensing media are making
critical reflection upon the war a tragic character flaw; to be against the war
they say is to be weak-minded, even unpatriotic. The media is quick to critique
those who disagree with the war machine, to instruct spectators that reversal of
fortune will befall critics of the war.
Postmodern war is corporeal theatre, more real than real. Soon the
TV cameras will depict the lines at the gas stations, the higher prices at the
pumps, the patriotic citizens giving blood at the blood bank, the nifty surgical
strikes, and the street theatre of resistance to the spectacle of military
industrial power. Postmodern war is all consuming, all life becomes a stage,
even resistance becomes part of the commodity production for mass consumption.
The Bush Jr. postmodern war is a sequel to the Bush Sr. postmodern war. I call
it "Oil War II, the Sequel: The Empire Strikes Back."
The
US strategy of War in the Middle East is a way to destabilize the economy of the
region. The strategy is exactly what Britain did in its 19th century
colonial "small wars." We like Britain are using higher-tech weapons
(smart bombs) to mow down a starving mob of spear-waving tribes at war with each
other. One more massacre is being planned by our Joint Chiefs, and another
decade of sanctions that will bring the death toll of Iraqi children to one
million. There is no glory in this postmodern war that substitutes sanitized
images using digital simulation for the blood cruelty of war. This is no Super
Bowl. The US sends the mightiest warriors on the planet to kill children on the
oil turf.
Behind
the war rhetoric about fear of the evil one who has amassed weapons of mass
destruction, there lies the corporate campaigns and lobbying of the oil
industry. We have surrendered media and government to the oil industry
colonization of nations destabilized by perpetual war. The US-based corporations
manufacture the lion's share of the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of
mass destruction, sells them to both side The US left 370,000 tons of
unexploded bombs, mines and artillery shells in the Gulf War alone. The
radiation particles dusted Southern Iraq.
References
Axelrod, Patricia (2002). Clean
lies, dirty wars. Reno News Review.
Best, Steve & Douglas Kellner (2001). Postmodern Adventure.
London: Guilford Press.
Boje, David M. (2002a). From the book, Theatrics
of Capitalism. Scene 11
Post-11. To be released soon I hope, from Hampton Press (San
Francisco).
Boje, David M. (2002b), What
Students and Faculty Need to Know about the Iraq War.
Boje, David M. (2003a) Oil
War: Propaganda
and Root Cause. Feb 1
Boje, David (2003b) Deconstructing
Sun News editorial - Jan 1
Boje, David M. (2003c) Deconstructing
Bu$h's State of the Union Theatre, Jan
Boje, David M. (2003) Militarism
and Middle School Jan 15
Boles, Elson E. (2002). Helping
Iraq Kill with Chemical Weapons: The Relevance of Yesterday's US Hypocrisy Today.
Counter Punch. October 10, 2002.
Borger, Julian (2002a). White
House 'Exaggerating Iraqi Threat' Bush's Televised Address Attacked by US
Intelligence. The Guardian (UK) October 8, 2002.
Borger, Julian (2002b). CIA
in blow to Bush attack plans. The
Guardian (UK). October 10, 2002
Collier, Robert (2002). Bush's
evidence of threat disputed Findings often ambiguous, contradict CIA. San
Francisco Chronicle. October 12.
Herold, Marc W. (2002). A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of Afghanistan:
A Comprehensive Accounting [revised]. Herold is
professor in the
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies,
Whittemore School of Business & Economics,
University of New Hampshire. Accessed http://www.cursor.org/stories/civilian_deaths.htm
Lightwear, Christos (2002). The
psychology behind mass subservience to tyranny and The Consequent Rise of the
Fourth Reich. Professors for Peace, Oct. 11.
Phillips, Kevin (2002). Of
Politics and Vengeance. LA Times. October 13 2002
Ridgeway, James (2002). The
Spoils of War: Be the First on Your Block to Make a Buck off Iraq. Village
Voice. October 9 - 15, 2002.
Strobel,Warren and Jonathan Landay (2002). Some
administration officials expressing misgivings on Iraq. Houston Chronicle
Oct 8.
Tripp, Ben (2002). Let
Wag the Dogs of War or No Peace at Any Price.
Counter Punch. October 9, 2002
Endnotes:
See www.PeaceAware.com
for Peace events and analysis