Donaghe
World History
Unit Six: World at War - 1914 to 1945
MAS: Mission Acievement and Success Charter School
Trench Warfare
World History Course Syllabus
World History Standards
Donaghe
Donaghe's Science
Donaghe's History
Donaghe's Classroom
My Students
Donaghe's Class Rules
Class News
The Reason I'm Here
What I Care About
Contact Donaghe
Hot Dog!
Mission Achievement and Success
Part 26: World War I
Part 26.1: The Great Nations
As European countries formed alliances and increased the sizes of their armed forces, they set the stage for a global war. All they needed was a good reason to mobilize troops. Another crisis in the Balkans in the summer of 1914 led directly to the conflict. When a Serbian terrorist assassinated Archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife, the powder keg exploded.

Causes of the War

  • Nationalism, militarism, and a system of alliances contributed to the start of World War I.
Nineteenth-century liberals believed that if European states were organized along national lines, these states would work together and create a peaceful Europe. They were wrong. The system of nation-states that emerged in Europe in the last half of the nineteenth century led not to cooperation but to competition.

Nationalism and Alliances
Rivalries over colonies and trade grew during an age of frenzied nationalism and imperialist expansion. At the same time, Europe’s great powers had been divided into two loose alliances. Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy formed the Triple Alliance in 1882. France, Great Britain, and Russia created the Triple Entente in 1907.

In the early years of the twentieth century, a series of crises tested these alliances. Especially troublesome were the crises in the Balkans between 1908 and 1913. These events left European states angry at each other and eager for revenge. Self-interest and success guided each state. They were willing to use war to preserve their power.

Nationalism in the nineteenth century had yet another serious result. Not all ethnic groups had become nations. Slavic minorities in the Balkans and the Hapsburg Empire, for example, still dreamed of their own national states. The Irish in the British Empire and the Poles in the Russian Empire had similar dreams.

Internal Dissent
National desires were not the only source of internal strife at the beginning of the 1900s. Socialist labor movements also had grown more powerful. The Socialists were increasingly inclined to use strikes, even violent ones, to achieve their goals. Some conservative leaders, alarmed at the increase in labor strife and class division, feared that European nations were on the verge of revolution. This desire to suppress internal disorder may have encouraged various leaders to take the plunge into war in 1914.

Militarism
The growth of mass armies after 1900 heightened the existing tensions in Europe. These large armies made it obvious that if war did come, it would be highly destructive.

Most Western countries had established conscription, a military draft, as a regular practice before 1914. (The United States and Britain were exceptions.) European armies doubled in size between 1890 and 1914. Militarism—the aggressive preparation for war—was growing. As armies grew, so too did the influence of military leaders. They drew up vast and complex plans for quickly mobilizing millions of soldiers and enormous quantities of supplies in the event of war.

Fearing that any changes would cause chaos in the armed forces, military leaders insisted that their plans could not be altered. This left European political leaders with little leeway. In 1914 they had to make decisions for military instead of political reasons.

What were some major causes of World War I?
 
REVIEW & DO NOW
Answer the following questions in your spiral notebooks:
Who were the members of the Triple Alliance?  When was it formed (that is, when did the third state join)?

Who were the members of the Triple Entente?  When was it formed?

What is conscription?

What happened to the size of European armies between 1890 & 1914?

What is militarism?

The German ambassador at Vienna described Austria’s reaction to the assassination:

“Here I hear even serious people express the desire of settling accounts with the Serbs once for all. A series of conditions should be sent to the Serbs, and if they do not accept these, energetic steps should be taken.”
— Dispatch from the German ambassador at Vienna, July 10, 1914
The Outbreak of War
  • Serbia’s determination to become a large, independent state angered Austria-Hungary and started hostilities.
Militarism, nationalism, and the desire to stifle internal dissent may all have played a role in the starting of World War I. However, it was the decisions that European leaders made in response to a crisis in the Balkans that led directly to the conflict.

Assassination in Sarajevo
By 1914, Serbia, supported by Russia, was determined to create a large, independent Slavic state in the Balkans. Austria-Hungary, which had its own Slavic minorities to contend with, was equally determined to prevent that from happening.

On June 28, 1914, Archduke Francis Ferdinand, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, and his wife Sophia visited the city of Sarajevo (sar•uh•YAY•voh) in Bosnia. A group of conspirators waited there in the streets.

In that group was Gavrilo Princip, a 19-year-old Bosnian Serb. Princip was a member of the Black Hand, a Serbian terrorist organization that wanted Bosnia to be free of Austria-Hungary and to become part of a large Serbian kingdom. An assassination attempt earlier that morning by one of the conspirators had failed. Later that day, however, Princip succeeded in fatally shooting both the archduke and his wife.

Austria-Hungary Responds
The Austro-Hungarian government did not know whether or not the Serbian government had been directly involved in the archduke’s assassination, but it did not care. Austrian leaders wanted to attack Serbia but feared that Russia would intervene on Serbia’s behalf. So, they asked for—and received—the backing of their German allies. Emperor William II of Germany gave Austria-Hungary a “blank check,” promising Germany’s full support if war broke out between Russia and AustriaHungary.

On July 28, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia.

Russia Mobilizes
Russia was determined to support Serbia’s cause. On July 28, Czar Nicholas II ordered partial mobilization of the Russian army against Austria-Hungary. Mobilization is the process of assembling troops and supplies for war. In 1914, mobilization was considered an act of war.

Leaders of the Russian army informed the czar that they could not partially mobilize. Their mobilization plans were based on a war against both Germany and AustriaHungary. Mobilizing against only Austria-Hungary, they claimed, would create chaos in the army. Based on this claim, the czar ordered full mobilization of the Russian army on July 29, knowing that Germany would consider this order an act of war.

The Conflict Broadens
Indeed, Germany reacted quickly. The German government warned Russia that it must halt its mobilization within 12 hours. When Russia ignored this warning, Germany declared war on Russia on August 1.

Like the Russians, the Germans had a military plan. General Alfred von Schlieffen (SHLEE•fuhn) had helped draw up the plan, which was known as the Schlieffen Plan. It called for a two-front war with France and Russia since the two had formed a military alliance in 1894. According to the Schlieffen Plan, Germany would conduct a small holding action against Russia while most of the German army would carry out a rapid invasion of France. This meant invading France by moving quickly along the level coastal area through Belgium. After France was defeated, the German invaders would move to the east against Russia.

Under the Schlieffen Plan, Germany could not mobilize its troops solely against Russia. Therefore, it declared war on France on August 3. About the same time, it issued an ultimatum to Belgium demanding that German troops be allowed to pass through Belgian territory.

On August 4, Great Britain declared war on Germany for violating Belgian neutrality. In fact, Britain, which was allied with France and Russia, was concerned about maintaining its own world power. As one British diplomat put it, if Germany and Austria-Hungary won the war, “what would be the position of a friendless England?”

By August 4, all the Great Powers of Europe were at war.

How did the Schlieffen Plan contribute to the outbreak of World War I?
 
REVIEW & DO NOW
Answer the following questions in your spiral notebooks:
What was the Bosnian Crisis?  When did it start?

Why were the Balkan states “up for grabs”?

What country was outraged by Austria-Hungary’s move?  Why?

What country saw themselves as protectors of the Slavic people?

What was Serbia’s ultimate goal?
What country stood in it’s way?

What country supported its ambitions?

Who was the Hapsburg (same family as Marie Antoinette) heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary?

What was the Black Hand and what was their goal?

What happened on June 28, 1914?  Where was this?

Who was Gavrilo Princip?  How old was he?

Who was emperor of Germany?
(Were Germany and Austria two separate countries?)

What happened on July 28, 1914?
What was Czar Nicholas II’s response?

What is mobilization?

How did the military leaders of Russia advise the czar?

What happened on August 1, 1914?

What was the Schlieffen Plan?

What happened on August 3?

What happened on August 4?

History
World History
Unit Six: The World at War
Part 26: World War I
Part 26.1: The Great Nations
Part 26.2: The Great War
Part 26.3: The Red Revolution
Part 26.4: The Great Peace
Standards, Objectives, and Vocabulary
Unit One: The Prehistoric World
Unit Two: The Ancient World
Unit Three: The Medieval World
Unit Four: The New World
Unit Five: The imperial World
Unit Six: The World at War
Cool History Videos
Go Back
Part 26.1:
The Great Nations
Please Continue...
Part 26:
World War I
Once you cover the basics, here are some videos that will deepen your understanding.
On YouTube
Goals & Objectives
of the Crash Course videos:
By the end of the course, you will be able to:

*Identify and explain historical developments and processes
*Analyze the context of historical events, developments, and processes and explain how they are situated within a broader historical context
*Explain the importance of point of view, historical situation, and audience of a source
*Analyze patterns and connections among historical developments and processes, both laterally and chronologically through history
*Be a more informed citizen of the world 

Crash Course World History #29:
The French Revolution
Crash Course World History #
In which John Green examines the French Revolution, and gets into how and why it differed from the American Revolution. Was it the serial authoritarian regimes? The guillotine? The Reign of Terror? All of this and more contributed to the French Revolution not being quite as revolutionary as it could have been. France endured multiple constitutions, the heads of heads of state literally rolled, and then they ended up with a megalomaniacal little emperor by the name of Napoleon. But how did all of this change the world, and how did it lead to other, more successful revolutions around the world? Watch this video and find out. Spoiler alert: Marie Antoinette never said, "Let them eat cake." Sorry. .
The
Beatles