William Byrd II, a wealthy eighteenth-century Virginia
planter, played a central role in his colony’s government. In addition
to serving as colonel of the county militia and as a member of the House
of Burgesses, Byrd founded the city of Richmond and experimented with a
variety of crops on his plantation. His wealth gave him the leisure
to pursue cultural interests, and he amassed over 4,000 books—the biggest
private library in the colonies. He left behind several diaries detailing
life on Southern plantations. On January 27, 1711, he noted:
“I rose at 5 o’clock and read two chapters in Hebrew and
some Greek in Lucian. I said my prayers and ate boiled milk for breakfast.
... I settled several accounts; then I read some English which gave
me great light into the nature of spirit. ... In the afternoon my
wife and I took a little walk and then danced together. Then I read
some more English. At night I read some Italian and then played at
piquet [a card game] with my wife. ... I said my prayers and had
good health, good thoughts, and good humor, thank God Almighty.”
—quoted in The Growth of the American Republic
The Southern Economy
The wealth of Westover, Byrd’s plantation, was built in
large part on the labor of enslaved Africans. In Byrd’s Virginia,
a class of wealthy planters stood on society’s top rung, while enslaved
Africans were at the bottom. In between were many farmers who owned
small farms and held few or no slaves.
From the earliest days of settlement, the Southern Colonies
developed an economy based on commercial agriculture. A few years
after the founding of Jamestown, tobacco became the South’s first successful
cash crop, or crop grown primarily for market. Tobacco became the
main cash crop grown in Virginia and Maryland and, to a lesser extent,
North Carolina. Rice and indigo became the main cash crops in South
Carolina. These cash crops needed the right kind of climate and techniques
to be cultivated. These requirements led to the rise of plantations,
or large commercial estates where many laborers lived on the land and cultivated
the crops for the landowner.
GEOGRAPHY
Tobacco and the Chesapeake
Between 1620 and 1660, the demand for tobacco in Europe
was greater than the supply. This kept the price high, ensuring that
most tobacco planters could make money even if they grew only a small amount.
Those who could grow and harvest a large quantity of tobacco could become
wealthy.
Growing tobacco required intensive manual labor.
Each plant had to be carefully nurtured before being cut and hung up to
cure. After curing, the leaves were packed into hogsheads—huge wooden
barrels—that, once filled and sealed, often weighed close to 1,000 pounds
(454 kg). The amount of labor needed to grow tobacco meant that to
become wealthy, a tobacco farmer needed a large work force to cultivate
a large crop.
The geography of the Chesapeake Bay region was perfectly
suited to tobacco farming. The bay acted like a wide road.
Numerous inlets and navigable rivers connected to the bay. If tobacco
farmers located their farms next to a river, they could ship their crop
from their own wharves. The colonists built very few roads or towns
because they had no need to move goods overland. Instead, merchant
ships made their way up the rivers from farm to farm, picking up tobacco
and selling supplies.
Indentured Servants
In the early days of Virginia and Maryland, there was
plenty of land for tobacco farmers but not enough labor to work it.
England had the opposite problem. Many poor tenant farmers had been
forced off the land during the enclosure movement, creating high unemployment
and a large number of people willing to sell their labor for a chance to
come to America and acquire their own land. To pay for their passage,
these people agreed to become indentured servants.
In this system, colonists in America agreed to pay the
cost of transporting the servants to the colonies and promised to provide
food, clothing, and shelter to them until their indentures, or labor contracts,
expired. In exchange, the servants agreed to work for the owner of
their contract for a specific number of years. These contracts usually
specified four years, but some were for seven years or even more if the
indentured servant arrived as a child.
For much of the 1600s, indentured servitude was a very
good system for tobacco planters. Indentured servants could produce
five times the price of their contracts in tobacco in the first year alone.
Under the headright system, every indentured servant transported to America
also earned the landowner another 50 acres of land. As large numbers
of indentured servants arrived in Virginia and Maryland, tobacco production
rose steadily.
Rice and Indigo in South Carolina
South of Virginia, the proprietors of South Carolina had
hoped their colony’s warm climate would permit the cultivation of sugarcane
as a cash crop. When sugarcane failed, the settlers also tried and
failed to cultivate rice. This venture also failed, because the settlers
did not know how to properly harvest rice. In addition, the extreme
humidity, swamps, mosquitoes, and muddy fields of the lowlands where rice
had to be planted discouraged cultivation.
In the 1690s, a new type of rice was introduced, and the
planters—many of whom had come from Barbados and Jamaica where slavery
was common—decided to import enslaved Africans to cultivate it. West
Africans had cultivated rice for centuries. Although their techniques
were very labor-intensive, they knew how to harvest rice and remove the
hull. Rice rapidly became a major cash crop in South Carolina and,
to a lesser extent, in Georgia.
In the early 1740s, South Carolina began to develop another
cash crop called indigo. Indigo was used to make blue dye for cloth—a
dye much in demand in Europe. Previously, planters in South Carolina
had tried to grow indigo without much success. Then, in the early
1740s, 17-year-old Eliza Lucas, began experimenting with the plant.
Lucas discovered that indigo needed high ground and sandy soil, not the
wetlands that suited rice.
Indigo was a good second crop for the rice plantations.
It could be grown on land unsuitable for rice, and it required care and
harvesting only in seasons when the enslaved workers were not busy with
rice.
Describing
Why did attempts to grow rice in South Carolina fail
at first?
Southern Society
Although many immigrants to the Southern Colonies hoped
to become wealthy, very few did. The nature of the plantation system
tended to create a society with distinct social classes. Planters
who could afford to bring in many slaves or indentured servants received
much larger land grants. With their large labor force and land area,
they could produce a much larger crop. The money they earned enabled
them to acquire still more workers and to extend their estates up and down
the rivers of a region. The result was a society where a wealthy
elite controlled most of the land and relied upon the labor of others to
work it for them.
The Planter Elite
The wealthy landowners, sometimes referred to as the Southern
gentry or the planter elite, enjoyed enormous economic and political influence.
They represented their communities in the governing councils and assemblies,
commanded the local militias, and served as county judges.
With few towns or roads in the region, the plantations
of the Southern gentry had to function as self-contained communities.
The residents lived near each other in a group of buildings, including
the planter’s great house, stables and barns, and the workers’ cabins.
Plantations often had other facilities such as schools and chapels, and
workshops for blacksmiths, carpenters, weavers, coopers (barrel makers),
and leather workers.
In the 1600s, most plantations were small, rough estates.
In many cases, they were little more than stump-filled clearings where
the planters and their indentured servants worked side-by-side under very
difficult conditions. Many became sick and died. Even in the
late 1600s, plantation workforces rarely exceeded 30 people. The
great houses on most of these early plantations were small, with only four
to seven rooms.
In the early 1700s, as wealthier planters in Virginia
and Maryland switched from indentured to slave labor, the size of their
plantations began to grow. As their wealth and property increased,
the gentry began to build large brick mansions with imposing steps and
doorways and elaborate gardens. They also tried to copy the fashions
and lifestyle of England’s upper class. No longer did they labor
in the fields with their workers. Instead, the gentry hired overseers
to manage the enslaved Africans, while they looked after accounts and other
business matters on the plantation.
As the wealth of the planter elite increased, so too did
their leisure time. The gentry often amused themselves by hunting
and fishing, and by gambling on horse races, cards, and dice. Some,
like William Byrd, enjoyed intellectual pursuits such as reading or practicing
music.
Backcountry Farmers
Close to half the indentured servants who came to the
Chesapeake region in the 1600s died before gaining their freedom.
Of those who became free, less than half acquired their own land.
Although land itself was very easy to acquire, settlers had to pay for
the deed and land survey and also had to pay for tools, seeds, and livestock.
Many could not afford these costs, and instead they became tenant farmers,
working lands that they rented from the planter elite.
Despite such difficulties, some former indentured servants
did acquire their own land. Although wealthy planters owned most
of the land along the rivers, most landowners in the colonial South were
actually small farmers living in the “backcountry” farther inland.
These farmers are sometimes referred to as yeomen, to distinguish them
from the gentry.
The backcountry farmers worked small plots of land and
lived in tiny one- or two-room houses with few furnishings. Although
these farmers grew some tobacco, they also practiced subsistence farming,
or farming only enough crops to feed their own families. Subsistence
crops included corn, beans, potatoes, barley, and rye. Hogs and other
livestock were allowed to run wild until needed for meat.
By the 1670s, the colonial South was a sharply divided
society, with a small group of wealthy planters at the top and many poor
backcountry farmers, landless tenant farmers, servants, and enslaved Africans
at the bottom. Eventually, this uneven distribution of wealth and
power led to rebellion.
Discussing
What led to the rise of the planter elite in colonial
Southern society?
Bacon’s Rebellion
By the 1660s, wealthy planters led by the governor, Sir
William Berkeley, dominated Virginia’s society. Berkeley controlled
the legislature through his appointments to the colony’s governing council
and gifts of land to members of the House of Burgesses.
Once Governor Berkeley had assembled a majority of supporters
in the House of Burgesses, he exempted himself and his councilors from
taxation. Convinced that voting should be reserved for the wealthy,
Berkeley also arranged for the House of Burgesses to restrict the vote
to people who owned property, cutting the number of voters in Virginia
in half. All of these developments angered the backcountry and tenant
farmers. Ultimately, however, it was the governor’s Native American
policies that sparked a revolt.
Crisis Over Land
The most important issue for most colonists was to acquire
land. Many indentured servants and tenant farmers wanted to own farms
eventually. Backcountry farmers wanted to expand their holdings.
By the 1670s, most remaining land was in areas claimed by Native Americans
in the Piedmont, the region of rolling hills between the coastal plains
and the Appalachians. Most wealthy planters lived near the coast
in the region known as the Tidewater.
They had no interest in the backcountry and did not want
to endanger their plantations by risking war with the Native Americans.
Therefore, they opposed expanding the colony into Native American lands.
This stand angered the backcountry farmers.
In 1675 war erupted between backcountry settlers and the
Susquehannock people of the region. Governor Berkeley tried to calm
things down. He refused to sanction any further military action against
the Native Americans. Instead he asked the House of Burgesses for
money to build new forts along the frontier—the westernmost point of colonial
settlement.
Nathaniel Bacon Leads a Revolt
In April 1676, a group of backcountry farmers met to discuss
the situation. At the meeting was a well-to-do planter named Nathaniel
Bacon, who had recently purchased a large tract of land near the frontier.
Although he was a member of the governor’s council, Bacon took up the cause
of the backcountry farmers. Native Americans had recently attacked
his plantation, and he wanted to do something.
Bacon organized his own militia and attacked the Native
Americans. Governor Berkeley decided to call new elections.
He needed an assembly supported by the voters to calm the situation.
The newly elected House of Burgesses authorized Bacon to raise a force
of 1,000 troops to attack the Native Americans. The assembly then
restored the vote to all free men and took away the tax exemptions Berkeley
had granted to his supporters.
Despite these reforms, Bacon was not satisfied.
In July 1676 he returned to Jamestown with several hundred armed men and
seized power, charging Berkeley with corruption. Berkeley fled Jamestown
and raised his own army. The two sides battled until October 1676,
when Bacon, hiding in a swamp, became sick and died. Without his
leadership, his army rapidly disintegrated.
Slavery Increases in Virginia
Bacon’s Rebellion convinced many wealthy planters that
the best way to keep Virginian society stable was to have land available
for the backcountry farmers. From the 1680s onward, Virginia’s government
generally supported expanding the colony westward, regardless of the impact
on Native Americans.
Bacon’s Rebellion also accelerated an existing trend in
Virginia—the use of enslaved Africans instead of indentured servants to
work the fields. In the 1680s, after the rebellion, the number of
Africans brought to the colony increased dramatically.
Planters began to switch to enslaved Africans for several
reasons. Enslaved workers, unlike indentured servants, did not have
to be freed and therefore would never need their own land. In addition,
when cheap land became available in the 1680s in the new colony of Pennsylvania,
fewer English settlers were willing to become indentured servants.
At the same time, the English government adopted policies
that encouraged slavery. English law limited trade between the English
colonies and other countries. Before the 1670s, if settlers wanted
to acquire enslaved Africans, they had to buy them from the Dutch or Portuguese,
which was difficult to arrange. In 1672, however, King Charles II
granted a charter to the Royal African Company to engage in the slave trade.
With an English company in the slave trade, it became much easier to acquire
enslaved people.
Examining
What government policies caused some backcountry farmers
to rebel?
Slavery in the Colonies
For enslaved Africans, the voyage to America usually began
with a march to a European fort on the West African coast. Tied together
with ropes around their necks and hands, they were traded to Europeans,
branded, and forced aboard a ship. Historians estimate that between
10 and 12 million Africans were forcibly transported to the Americas between
1450 and 1870. Of those 10 to 12 million, roughly 2 million died
at sea.
Olaudah Equiano, also known as Gustavus Vassa, was kidnapped
from his West African home by other Africans in the 1760s. He was
then traded to Europeans and shipped to America. Years later, after
winning his freedom, he wrote a memoir. In it, he described the terrible
journey across the Atlantic, known to Europeans as the Middle Passage:
“At last, when the ship we were in had got in all her
cargo, ... we were all put under deck. ... The closeness of the place,
and heat of the climate, added to the number in the ship, which was so
crowded that each had scarcely room to turn himself, almost suffocated
us. ... [This] brought on a sickness among the slaves, of which many
died. ... The shrieks of the women, and the groans of the dying,
rendered the whole a scene of horror almost inconceivable....”
—from The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah
Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa the African
Chained and crammed into the ships’ filthy holds for more
than a month, prisoners like Equiano could hardly sit or stand and were
given minimal food and drink. Africans who died or became sick were
thrown overboard. Those who refused to eat were whipped.
Of the 8 to 10 million Africans who reached the Americas,
approximately 3.5 million went to Brazil, and another 1.5 million went
to the Spanish colonies. The British, French, and Dutch colonies
in the Caribbean imported nearly 4 million others to work on their sugar
plantations. Approximately 500,000 Africans were transported to North
America before the slave trade ended in the 1800s.
When the first Africans arrived in Virginia in 1619, English
law did not recognize chattel slavery, where one human being is said to
be owned by another. As a result, slavery developed slowly in the
Chesapeake colonies. The first Africans brought to Virginia and Maryland
were treated in a manner similar to indentured servants, and children born
to Africans were not always considered enslaved.
Some of the first enslaved Africans obtained their freedom
by converting to Christianity. To many English settlers in the early
1600s, enslaving Africans was acceptable not because of their race, but
because they were not Christians. As the number of Africans increased
in Virginia and Maryland, their status changed. In 1638 Maryland
became the first British colony to formally recognize slavery when it denied
Africans the same rights as English citizens.
Beginning in the 1660s, new laws in Virginia and Maryland
gradually lowered the status of all Africans, regardless of their religion,
and changed slavery into a hereditary system based on race. Finally,
in 1705, Virginia pulled all of these different laws together into a slave
code —a set of laws that formally regulated slavery and defined the relationship
between enslaved Africans and free people.
Other colonies created their own slave codes. Over
time slave codes became increasingly strict. Africans were denied
the right to own property or to testify against a white person in court.
Their movements were regulated, and they were often forbidden to assemble
in large numbers. By the early 1700s, slavery had become a recognized
and generally accepted institution in colonial society, particularly in
the Southern Colonies, where the labor of hundreds of thousands of enslaved
Africans played a vital role in the growth of the plantation economy.
Explaining
How did the concept of slavery
in the Southern Colonies change over time?
REVIEW & DO
NOW
Answer the following questions: |
|
|
|
|
|